'Marijuana Debate\r'

' erica Del Vigna Coms 2 Negative Outline proffer: The raise of atomic number 20 should legalise cannabis. I. Introduction thesis: Though I maintain that marihuana should be put into a controlled environment, I believe it should non be legalized due to its poor wellness attri scarcelyes, and its disconfirming influence towards the youthfulness and drug users. Preview: I go out be explaining today why the affirmatives curriculum does go out non work as a sufficient plan in atomic number 20. I exit start by refuting his claims that marijuana is non a gateway drug. I will also explain the future harm that legalizing this drug could do to the youth of our terra firma.Fin tout ensembley, I will connect the link on drug users to criminals. Overall this drug does not gather our future generations socially or for their health. According to Scripps inebriantic drink and Treatment Center in California, â€Å"we have save to perk a patient come by here who doesnâ€℠¢t attribute his addiction to having started with marijuana as a gateway drug”. II. trunk A. Ills and significance refutation 1. The affirmative claims that marijuana is not a gateway drug, which is the farthest from the truth. Most hoi polloi who atomic number 18 in a treatment subject matter started off by occasionally victimisation marijuana.As I stated in my previous quote from the Scripps alcohol center, most addicts blame their addiction habits to starting with a gateway drug like marijuana or alcohol. The clinician who was interviewed stated that society realizes the real dangers of marijuana as a gateway drug. Even though in 1996, medical exam exam marijuana was passed by California voters with overture 215 by a 56 % passing appraise; in 2010, Proposition 19 failed be dress California voters did not want to legalize marijuana, as stated in the Christian Science Monitor dated whitethorn 2012. . The affirmative argues that law enforcement should spend their day s flake something more important than drug users. I powerfully disagree with this because of the evidence showing that drug users malarkey to harsher crimes. Allowing stack to use drugs is telling the youth of California that it is okay to smoke weed. This could potentially turn other than respectable children into drug using, criminal adults. In the oblige by the American Academy of Pediatrics, â€Å"Legalization of marijuana: Potential impact on youth” in 2004, the doctors state that legalization of marijuana would have a negative effect on youth because in would decrease the adolescents’ perceptions of risk and increase their exposure to the drug. In comparison to a Dutch study from 1984 to 1992, decriminalisation increases marijuana use by adolescents because making marijuana legal makes it available. American manufacturers of alcohol and tobacco commercialise their products to young people and marijuana would be the same.Marketing question shows that if on ly 1% of 15-19 year old Americans began using marijuana, there would be approximately 190,000 new users. B. remedy refutation 1. —The affirmative’s plan will not work for multiple reasons. Although some may use the drug for health benefits, it will cause more problems to society than help. The Office of National do drugs Control Policy director, John Walters states that Marijuana insurance the brain, heart, lungs, immune system and contains cancer-causing compounds. It also impairs learning, memory, perception and perceptiveness which are affiliated to car accidents and workplace accidents.It should not be legalized because it is too dangerous and causes severe health problems. In the denomination by Taxman and Thanner, â€Å"Risk, Need, and Responsivity” in Crime & amp; Delinquency dated 2006, the authors agree that marijuana should not be legalized because 20% of the state drug offenders reported involvement with firearms and 24% of the state drug offender s had prior convictions for wild offenses.. Repeat offenders connected with weapons and violent offenses incur high costs; but keeping these criminals off of the streets is worth it. C. Cost-Benefits â€There are 4 main disadvantages that could take place if we legalize marijuana: 1. medicine users throughout the general existence may rise. 2. Many more people will be using firearm and could demonstrate violent behavior 3. More health damage than heavy could affect millions of people either as users or from second hand smoke 4. Moral and respectable values could be put in peril III. Conclusion 1. California currently only allows medical marijuana users to legally purchase marijuana. If we allow all citizens to have access to this drug, we could potentially lead California down a very bad path.We would see far more crimes and cases of drug addiction. We do not want the future leaders and adults to think that it is politically or socially correct to use this drug. 2. It is cr ystallise from previous California elections that California’s people do not want the law to be changed. In order to keep the state safe, and healthy, it is essential that marijuana is not legalized for recreational use. Works Cited 1. Joffe, Alain and W. Samuel Yancy. â€Å" principle of Marijuana: Potential Impact on Youth. ” American Academy of Pediatrics. 113:6 (2004): 632-638. 2. Taxman, Faye and Meridith Thanner. Risk, Need and Responsivity. ” Crime & Delinquency. 52:28 (2005): 28-51. 3. Weil, A. T. et. al. â€Å"Clinical and Psychological effect of Marijuana in Man. ” Science Magazine. 162:1234 (1968): 129-132. 4. Benson, John et. al. â€Å" aesculapian Marijuana †should marijuana be a medical option? ” Neighborhood Link National Network. Retrieved from www. neighborhoodlink. com/article/Community/ medical exam_Marijuana. 5. Khatapoush, S. and D. Halifors. â€Å"Sending the Wrong Message: Did Medical Marijuana Legalization in Calif ornia transmit Attitudes about use of Marijuana? ” Journal of Drug Issues. 34:4 (2012): 751-770.\r\n'