Slavery in Aristotles Works Essay example -- Aristotle Philosophy Sla

Before a serious probe of whatever aspect of Aristotles semipolitical theories is undertaken, we essentialiness take a event to acknowledge that m each of the institutions and doctrines he defends cave in been repudiated in modern political thought. In fact m whatever such institutions are appalling and plain morally wrong. One such institution is thraldom. Aristotle argues in the Politics that striverry is just. No argument is needed to conclude that Aristotle made a stark ethical and moral error in defending slavery. Further we must accept that the argument of the abolition of slavery was available to him as his falsification of slavery is in response to critics who claim slavery is unjust. What sparks intriguing upset is questioning why Aristotle defended slavery, and whether there is a flaw in Aristotles logic in his defense of slavery, or if it is in fact internally consistent with the rest of his writings on justice and virtue. Some scholars hav e claimed that Aristotles defense of slavery is a battered shipwreck of an argument. Yet, others plead that the argument is in fact internally consistent. Any argument in favor of Aristotles defense of slavery is not in any way meant to morally support the institution of slavery only that Aristotle use proper or unflawed logic in that argument. Likewise any argument against Aristotles defense is not a moral image toward slavery by this author. I am only concerned in how Aristotle builds his argument, and where flaws or contradictions may be located. Consideration of the context of slavery inside Greek life of Aristotles time is also of importance. Any investigation or commentary on Aristotles slavery argument must first begin with the context of slave... ...s two separate, distinct entities. As intimated above, he more likely viewed them as a duality, that is, that they are element of star another. They were also, in the larger sense, part of the life of the ho usehold, as the household was part of the polis. However, this duality was strictly one way. It seems clear that he perceived the slave to be part of the master, not the other way around. But again, this was reassert by Aristotles ultimate virtue, reason. To the extent that the master is seen as imbued with master intelligence and understanding, it was his duty if not right to provide guidance to those less(prenominal) fortunate by birth. It is perhaps ironic that the justification of the benevolent dictatorship, so prevalent during imperialistic adventures by colonial countries, perhaps found its philosophical roots in the so-called democratic city-states of ancient Greece.