Writing an open MEMO Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Writing an open MEMO - Term Paper moralHaving been dismissed three times, De La Campa still insists that she was discriminated against and her supervisors said words that were against her gender. Yes she has a case since the words communicate to her by her supervisor and employer are versedly discriminating and she therefore needs justice Answer No in these cases, first De La Campa appeals against her case with her employer and supervisors about her familiar arrestment. Having gone to three courts both dismissing her cases against her supervisors as containing no intentional inflictions of any ruttish distress on De La Campa based on her sexual orientation. In this case, De La Campa alleges that Garcia and Teixeira subjected her to a pervasive and severe pattern of sexual harassment. This included and not peculiar(a) to comments that were derogatory that were homosexually related, unwelcoming abusive conducts and acts that were directed to her due to her sexual orientation, and since she asked for her right to work freely without discrimination, all these were condition to her. She claims that Teixeira advised her that Grifols was not very pleased by the way that she was sexually oriented and that this could lead to her termination. She besides claims that she was excluded from social functions and corporate sponsored functions due to her sexual orientation.... CREAC Contention De La Campa has a case against her employer and her supervisors due to the harassment that she got from her sexual orientation and the exclusion that she got from her sexual orientation. It is in any case evident from the actions of the employers that threatened the termination of De La Campa that she was going to be terminated due to her sexual orientation. . Aguilera also has a case due to the injury that she got from the machines that were operated by the company. Mrs. McCarson is also entitled to sue the insurance company for failing to pay for her medication yet she had been insured. Rule The only component part of the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress tort that is in dispute is the outrageous element. The Florida Supreme act defines an outrageous conduct as a conduct that is so outrageous in character, and so radical in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McCarron, 467 So.2d 277, 279 (Fla.1985) (adopting monetary standard set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, section 46 cmt. d (1965) for evaluating claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress). What constitutes outrageous conduct is a question for the trial court to determine as a payoff of law. Johnson v. Thigpen, 788 So.2d 410, 413 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Explanation from this it is clear that a person is guilty of sexual discrimination only if he/she does anything that s considered outrageous and that goes beyond any possible bounds of decency. It is very important to consider an act as outrageous since this will be the factor to make the employer guilty or not. Due to the distress that De La Campa experienced, it is evident that she has a case here